• Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

UkrainianProfessional Education

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 07.09.2021

Revised 11.11.2021

Accepted 20.12.2021

Retrieved from Vol. 12, No. 1, 2022

Pages 60 -84

  • 413 Views

Suggested citation

Stepanenko, S., Teslenko, M., & Nakonechna, V. (2022). Economic-psychological conceptual fundamentals of the happiness phenomenon understanding within the interdisciplinary paradigm. Psychology and Personality, 12(1), 60-84. https://doi.org/10.33989/2226-4078.2022.1.252053

Economic-psychological conceptual fundamentals of the happiness phenomenon understanding within the interdisciplinary paradigm

Serhii Stepanenko Maryna Teslenko Valeriia Nakonechna

Abstract

The article is devoted to the theoretical analysis results presentation of economic and psychological principles of the happiness understanding as an interdisciplinary phenomenon. Theoretical generalizations of the happiness economy basic provisions and the state of human happiness basic characteristics in the framework of economic research are presented. It is concluded that the «happiness economy» development current areas are the study of factors influencing life satisfaction (age, gender, external attractiveness, level of education, marital status, number of children); study of the relationship between a person's level of happiness and social characteristics of his life (level of trust, number and quality of social contacts, involvement in various social groups), analysis of the public policy measures impact on public subjective well-being, etc. The specifics of the happiness and its achievement determinants interpretation within the framework of psychological research are revealed. Psychological understanding of the happiness phenomenon involves giving more weight to the subjective characteristics of his experience, which are realized in the affective and cognitive evaluative judgments of a person about quality of life, experiencing a sense of coherence and orderliness, clarity of life goals and activities. The happiness phenomenon research methodical means in the economic and psychological perspective are analyzed and the specifics of the use of socioeconomic indicators for measuring happiness at the national and global levels of human functioning are described

Keywords:

happiness, «happiness economy», indicators of happiness, determinants of happiness, economic and psychological principles of happiness phenomenon understanding, psychological well-being of the individual, economic and psychological factors of well-being, indicators of human happiness diagnostic means

References

[1] Argyle, M. (2003). The psychology of happiness (2nd ed.). St. Petersburg: Piter.

[2] Butnyk, O. (2017). Research on the happiness index of the population in the context of effective public administration. Investments: Practice and Experience, 22, 73-75.

[3] Chinakova, N. (2016). Economics of happiness: Modern research and discussions. World of Economics and Management, 16(1), 101-115.

[4] Crimmins, J.E. (2021). Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bentham/. 

[5] Dereha, V. (2014). State family policy and issues of its formation in the European Union. Scientific Works of [Petro Mohyla Black Sea State University of the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Complex]. Series: Political Science, 230(218), 22-27.

[6] Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.

[7] Easterlin, R.A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(1), 89-125. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7. 

[8] Easterlin, R.A., McVey, L.A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J.S. (2010). The happiness-income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(52), 22463-22468. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015962107. 

[9] Frey, B.S., &Stutzer, A. (2002) Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.13918.

[10] GNH Survey Findings. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.grossnationalhappiness.com/docs/2010_Results/PDF/National.pdf.   

[11] Happy planet index 2016: Measuring sustainable wellbeing. (2016).  Retrieved from https://networkofwellbeing.org/2016/07/20/happy-planet-index-2016-measuring-sustainable-wellbeing/#:~:text=The%20HPI%20is%20the%20leading,to%20lead%20long%2C%20happy%20lives.

[12] Havryshchak, L., & Borysenko, Z. (2019). Happiness as a psychological category. Problems of the Humanitarian Sciences. Psychology, 45, 39–51. doi: 10.24919/2312-8437.45.196994. 

[13] Helliwell, J.F., Layard, R., Sachs, J., & De Neve, J.-E. (Eds.). (2021). World Happiness Report 2021. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

[14] Holovakha, Y., & Horbachyk, A. (2012). Tendencies of social changes in Ukraine and Europe: Based on the results of the “European Social Survey” 2005–2007–2009–2011. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.

[15] Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, Freedom, and Rising Happiness: A Global Perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 264-285. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00078.x.

[16] Kaftulina, Y., & Krivova, A. (2015). Happinomics – The economy of the future. Models, Systems, Networks in Economics, Engineering, Nature, and Society, 4(16), 31-37.

[17] Kahneman, D., Krueger, A.B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A.A. (2006). Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science (New York, N.Y.), 312(5782), 1908–1910. doi:  10.1126/science.1129688. 

[18] Kalmykova, A. (2015). Conceptual apparatus of the theory of "economics of happiness." Bulletin of the International Institute of Economics and Law, 3(20), 7-15.

[19] Kronik, A., & Akhmerov, R. (2003). Causometry: Methods of self-knowledge, psychodiagnostics, and psychotherapy in the psychology of life path. moscow: Smysl.

[20] Kuzikova, S., & Shcherbak, T. (2020). Socio-psychological factors of personal experience of happiness. Bulletin of H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University. Psychology, 62, 200-213. doi: 10.34142/23129387.2020.62.11.

[21] Kyrylenko, O. (2017). The well-being of people as the object of sociological research: Felicitological approach. The Bulletin of Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University. Series: Philosophy, Philosophy of Law, Political Science, Sociology, 3(30), 18-33. doi: 10.21564/2075-7190.30.90225.

[22] Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1983). The experience sampling method. New Directions for Methodology of Social & Behavioral Science, 15, 41-56. 

[23] Leontiev, D. (2020). Happiness and well-being: Toward the construction of the conceptual field. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 1, 14-37. doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2020.1.02.  ​

[24] Layard, R. (2012). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing. 

[25] Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H.S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137-155. doi: 10.1023/A:1006824100041.

[26] Paniotto, V.., Sakhno, Y., & Pyaskovska, A. (2018). Dynamics of happiness levels and their determinants in Ukraine 2001-2017. Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing, 1, 84-102.

[27] Pereverzeva, A. (2009). Human happiness index as an indicator of human potential realization. Actual Problems of Economics, 7, 201-207. 

[28] Popadynec, O. (2013). The impact of employment level and wages on economic agents' satisfaction from the perspective of "happiness economics." Bulletin of the National Technical University "KhPI," 66, 76-80. 

[29] Ryff, C.D. (1996). Psychological well-being. Encyclopedia of Gerontology,  2, 365-369.

[30] Seligman, M.E.P. (2006). New positive psychology: A scientific perspective on happiness and meaning in life. moscow: Sofia Publishing House. 

[31] Shevelenkova, T.., & Fesenko, P.  (2005). Psychological well-being of the individual (review of main concepts and research methodology).Psychological Diagnostics, 3, 95-129.

[32] Shkurko, K. (2017). Human happiness as a criterion for the progressive development of Ukrainian society. East, 4, 111-118. 

[33] Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. In Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (pp. 1–87). Washington: Brookings Institution Press. 

[34] Style, S. (2013). Positive psychology: What makes us happy, optimistic, and motivated. moscow: Pretext. 

[35] The next frontier: Human development and the anthropocene. Ukraine. (2020). Retrieved fromhttp://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/Country-Profiles/UKR.pdf.

[36] Tytarenko, T. (2017). Happiness, health, and well-being: Achieving the unattainable. Psychological well-being perspectives. In Proceedings of the 19th all-Ukrainian scientific and practical seminar (pp. 7-2). Nizhyn: M. Hohol NDU.

[37] Vereshchahina, H., & Shigol, F. (2020). Theoretical foundations, practice, and empirical approaches to assessing the economy of happiness. Development Management, 18(2), 33-42. doi: 10.21511/dm.18(2).2020.04.  

[38] Vinychuk, N. (2012). Features of psychosomatic patients' perceptions of happiness. Psychological Research, 2(22), 7.

[39] What is the positive and negative affect schedule? (PANAS). (2019). Retrieved from https://positivepsychology.com/positive-and-negative-affect-schedule-panas/. 

[40] World happiness report 2020. (2020). Retrieved from https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2020/.

[41] World happiness report 2021. (2021). Retrieved from https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2021/.

[42] World Happiness Report. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.gallup.com/analytics/349487/gallup-global-happiness-center.aspx.

[43] World values survey. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp.

[44] Yarmolenko, Y. (2016). Sustainable development of the agro-industrial complex as a component of the happiness economy. Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 2, 107-111. 

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.33989/2226-4078.2022.1.252053

Address 36003, Ukraine, Poltava, 2, Ostrohradskyi Str.

Email info@psychpersonality.com.ua