Received 27.07.2022
Revised 29.08.2022
Accepted 29.09.2022
Retrieved from Vol. 12, No. 2, 2022
Pages 85 -97
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the results of theoretical and empirical research of students’ coping strategies and the connection of coping with the preservation of productivity and high functionality in stressful situations (in relation to the results of diagnosis of students’ procrastination). Theoretical analysis of the specifics of the effectiveness of coping strategies is presented. The empirical study involved 66 students of 2-4 courses. Diagnosis of coping tension was performed using the Ways of Coping Questionnaire, WCQ (R. Lazarus) and "Tuckman General Procrastination Scale (adapted by T. L. Kryukova)". The results of an empirical study of students' coping have been analyzed. It has been found that the most often behavioral strategies to which students apply are: planning (57.5%) and positive reassessment (56.6%); the search for social support, acceptance of responsibility and self-control are equally pronounced (31.8%); distancing, avoidance, and confrontational coping are less common. The severity and dominance of coping strategies in groups of respondents with different levels of procrastination have been analyzed. According to the results, the most developed behavioral strategies for students with low procrastination are positive reassessment and planning (the latter is more often represented by the dominant strategy). Among the group with a medium level of procrastination, these two copings are also equally pronounced. However, there is a lack of tension in other, active behavioral strategies. Among people with a high level of procrastination, the statistical predominance of one or another coping is not recorded, we widely observe the severity of only one or two strategies, or low tension of all presented copings. After analyzing the dominant copings of people with low procrastination, a hypothesis was formulated about the possible inverse correlation between the severity of positive revaluation and procrastination, the test was performed by mathematical data processing (Spearman's correlation analysis). No significant correlations were found, so the hypothesis was not confirmed. The results of empirical research can be used both to develop recommendations, developmental and educational activities aimed at preventing the decline in productivity and efficiency, and to highlight the understudied topic of the links between coping strategies and the phenomenon of procrastination
Keywords:
coping strategies, adaptability, students, behavioral strategies, procrastination[1] Amelina, A. (2008). Stress and stress protection. Moscow: Smart.
[2] Chumakova, E. (1998). Psychological defense of personality in the system of child-parent interaction (Doctoral dissertation, Saint Petersburg, Saint Petersburg State University, Russia).
[3] Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R.S. (1988). Coping as a mediator of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(3), 466-475.
[4] Kuprene, E. V. (2011). Current state and methods of coping strategies in psychology. Vocational Education, 5, 69-71.
[5] Maksimova, N.Y. (1996). On the tendency of adolescents toward addictive behavior. Psychological Journal, 17(3), 149-152.
[6] Rasskazova, E., Gordeeva, T., & Osin, E. (2013). Coping strategies in the structure of activity and self-regulation: Psychometric characteristics and applications of the COPE methodology. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 1, 82-118.
[7] Semichov, S.B. (1972). Theory of crises and psychoprophylaxis. In V.N. Myasishchev (Ed.), Neuroses and borderline conditions (Vol. 63, pp. 96-99). Leningrad: Leningrad Scientific Research Psychoneurological Institute named after V.M. Bekhterev.
[8] Steel, P. (2011). The procrastination equation: How to stop putting things off and start getting stuff done. New York: HarperCollins.
[9] Subbotina, Y. (2013). Psychology of personality defense mechanisms. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State University.
[10] Tuckman, B.W. (1991). The development and concurrent validity of the procrastination scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(2), 473-480. doi: 10.1177/0013164491512022.