Received 14.04.2023
Revised 20.07.2023
Accepted 31.08.2023
Retrieved from Vol. 13, No. 2, 2023
Pages 223 -262
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to consider the process of creating the author՚s psychodiagnostic methodology SEDNOR on the basis of various integrated scientific approaches, taking into account the age characteristics of the personality and the conditions of the respondents; to analyze the results of a long-term experimental study aimed at studying and psychodiagnosing the relationship between perceptual, cognitive processes and creative potential of the personality on the examples of primary school students; to describe the algorithm of the author՚s psychodiagnostic projective methodology SEDNOR, to develop the algorithm of the author՚s psychodiagnostic methodology. The following methods were used. From the group of theoretical foundations, the Rorschach Inkblot Test, Osgood՚s Semantic Differential (SD), the fuzzy rating scale, and the interpretation of the non-existent animal technique using SD were used. The author՚s SEDNOR methodology was used to study the creative potential of the individual (taking into account complex mental intertwining) by using the perceptual and imaginative components of the student՚s personality. Over the course of more than 30 years, a total of about 30,000 respondents of different age groups, from children aged 7 to early adulthood, have participated in the study. The study presents results only for a sample of primary school children. The empirical study was conducted on the basis of secondary schools in Lviv. Lviv. Informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from all participants. The article presents a theoretical analysis of the phenomenon of the “basic image” and creative potential as psychological phenomena, highlights their features in terms of different interpretations. The psychological factors of the image emergence are analyzed and a hypothetical model of its emergence is built. The results of an empirical study aimed at experimentally investigating the creative potential of junior schoolchildren using the author՚s SEDNOR methodology are analyzed. The mechanism of influence of the studied types of unstructured images on the level of creative potential of an individual is substantiated. As a result of the study, a high level of reliability of the proposed projective psychodiagnostic methodology SEDNOR as an opportunity for modern diagnostics of personality creativity has been determined. It is noted that a comparative analysis of the results of the psychodiagnostic projective methodology SEDNOR and the indicators of control methods for the study of the creative potential of the individual was carried out, which indicates the possibility of using this methodology in Ukraine and the possibility of its adaptation in other countries. Special general recommendations for the use of the SEDNOR psychodiagnostic methodology and conclusions based on the results of diagnostics have been developed
Keywords:
imagination, test modeling, SEDNOR, diagnostic potential, semantic differential, fuzzy rating scale, unstructured images[1] Katolyk, H. (1990). Study of students' imagination using an express diagnostic method (Doctoral dissertation, Kyiv, Ukraine).
[2] Katolyk, H. (1994). Psychoanalysis and creativity. In Almanac 94: Artistic Scientific and Practical Illustrated Annual (pp. 54-62). Lviv: Herdan Company.
[3] Katolyk, H. (1996). Is it possible to measure giftedness? Konspiekt, 1, 14-19.
[4] Katolyk, H. (1996). Study of creativity using the author's diagnostic projective method “SEDNOR”. Lviv: LONMIO.
[5] Katolyk, H. (1997). Artistic choice and personality. In Almanac 95/96: Artistic Scientific and Practical Illustrated Annual (pp. 43-48). Lviv: Herdan Company.
[6] Katolyk, H., & Bushchak, H. (1999). Psychology of creativity and the educational process. In I. Holod (Ed.), Art school in the system of national education of Ukraine (pp. 49-79). Lviv.
[7] Katolyk, H., & Kalka, N. (2022). Psychology of personality (in schemes, presentations, and tables): A textbook. Lviv: Lviv State University of Internal Affairs.
[8] Osgood, C.E. (1976). Focus of meaning (Vol. 1: Exploration semantic space). Mouton: The Hague & Paris.
[9] Rorschach, H. (1924). Manual for Rorschach ink-blot test. Chicago: Stoelting.
[10] Rorschach, H. (1942). Psychodiagnostics: A diagnostic test based on perception. Berne,: Hans Huber.
[11] Rorschach, H. (1948). Psychodiagnostik (tafeln): Psychodiagnostics (plates). Bern: Hans Huber.
[12] Rorschach, H. (1951). Psychodiagnostics: A diagnostic test, based on perception. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.
[13] Rorschach, H., & Beck, S.J. (1932). The Rorschach test as applied to a feeble-minded group. New York.
[14] Rorschach, H., & Klopfer, B. (1938). Rorschach Research Exchange. New York.
[15] Rorschach, H., & Oberholzer, E. (1924). The application of the interpretation of form to psychoanalysis. Chicago.
[16] Snider, J.G., & Osgood, C.E. (Eds.). (1969). Semantic differential technique: A sourcebook. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.