Article

Received 15.01.2025

Revised 25.04.2025

Accepted 29.05.2025

Retrieved from Vol. 15, No. 1, 2025

Pages 32 -41

Zavhorodnia, O., & Shepelova, M. (2025). Subjective well-being in wartime: The role of age and gender. Psychology and Personality, 15(1), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.33989/2226-4078.2025.1.32

Subjective well-being in wartime: The role of age and gender

Olena Zavhorodnia Mariia Shepelova

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of subjective well-being and ill-being among civilians amidst the uncertainties of war, with a specific focus on age and gender factors. The study involved 147 civilians aged 17 to 49 living in Kyiv, Kharkiv, and Zhytomyr. A six-cluster subjective well-being scale was used. The results showed that the subjective well-being of Ukrainians was generally at an average level. Analysis of the key components of subjective well-being revealed certain differences depending on the age and gender of the participants. The findings indicated that only 2% of respondents reported complete subjective well-being, 22% experienced moderate emotional comfort, 64% reported a typical level of well-being, 10% tended towards depression and anxiety, and 2% experienced significant emotional discomfort. Age differences were observed: younger respondents (17-21 years) were more prone to high levels of psycho-emotional stress, rated their health more negatively, and experienced greater social isolation. In contrast, older participants (36 years and above) demonstrated better adaptation to adverse circumstances and were less affected by negative emotions. While older individuals reported lower mood scores, they also indicated higher satisfaction with their daily routines. Among all age groups, those aged 22-35 displayed the most favourable indicators of subjective well-being. Gender differences revealed that men showed slightly more signs of subjective ill-being compared to women. Men exhibited higher levels of stress and psycho-emotional symptoms, whereas women demonstrated a stronger tendency towards mood decline. These findings may inform professionals in psychological support, education, social work, and public administration in identifying at-risk groups, determining priority areas for intervention, and tailoring support to the specific needs of different demographic groups – particularly young people, older adults, women, and men – in order to enhance psychological resilience and quality of life under prolonged crisis conditions

psychological stress; gender differences; age-related characteristics; mental health; emotional comfort/discomfort
  1. Abdullahi, A.M., Orji, R., & Kawu, A.A. (2019). Gender, age and subjective well-being: Towards personalized persuasive health interventions. Information, 10(10), article number 301. doi: 10.3390/info10100301.
  2. American Sociological Association’s Code of Ethic. (1997). Retrieved from https://www.asanet.org/wpcontent/uploads/savvy/images/asa/docs/pdf/CodeofEthics.pdf.
  3. Biermann, P., Bitzer, J., & Gören, E. (2022). The relationship between age and subjective well-being: Estimating within and between effects simultaneously. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 21, article number 100366. doi: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2021.100366.
  4. Birditt, K.S., Turkelson, A., Fingerman, K.L., Polenick, C.A., & Oya, A. (2021). Age differences in stress, life changes, and social ties during the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for psychological well-being. Gerontologist, 61(2), 205-216. doi:10.1093/geront/gnaa204.
  5. Blanchflower, D.G. (2021). Is happiness U-shaped everywhere? Age and subjective well-being in 145 countries. Journal of Population Economics, 34(2), 575-624. doi: 10.1007/s00148-020-00797-z.
  6. Blanchflower, D.G., & Bryson, A. (2024). The female happiness paradox. Journal of Population Economics, 37(1), article number 16. doi:10.1007/s00148-024-00981-5.
  7. Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A.M., & Strough, J. (2020). Age differences in reported social networks and wellbeing. Psychology and Aging, 35(2), 159-168. doi: 10.1037/pag0000415.
  8. Buecker, S., Luhmann, M., Haehner, P., Bühler, J.L., Dapp, L.C., Luciano, E.C., & Orth, U. (2023). The development of subjective well-being across the life span: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 149(7-8), 418-446. doi: 10.1037/bul0000401.
  9. Chachko, S., & Yaroslavsky, D. (2023). Gender features of experiencing prolonged traumatic stress in the context of military threats in Ukraine. Perspectives and Innovations, 15(33), 916-927. doi: 10.52058/27864952-2023-15(33)-916-927.
  10. Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E., & Smith, H.L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276.
  11. Gisinger, T., Dev, R., Kautzky, A., Harreiter, J., Raparelli, V., Kublickiene, K., Herrero, M.T., Norris, C.M., Lavoie, K.L., Pilote, L., & Kautzky-Willer, A. (2022). Sex and gender impact mental and emotional well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: A European countries experience. Journal of Women’s Health, 31(11), 1529-1539. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0115.
  12. Gradus Research. (2021). Happiness level by gender, age, region and size of the settlement. Retrieved from https://gradus.app/documents/53/Happiness_2_wave_03022021_.pdf.
  13. Graham, C., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2013). Gender and well-being around the world. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(2), 212-232. doi: 10.1504/IJHD.2013.055648.
  14. Horenko, M.V. & Radzivil, K.P. (2023). Psychological well-being of future psychologists in the conditions of war. Habitus, 56, 65-69. doi: 10.32782/2663-5208. 2023.56.10.
  15. Hsieh, S., Chang, Y.-H., Yao, Z.-F., Yang, M.-H., & Yang, C.-T. (2024). The effect of age and resilience on the dose – response function between the number of adversity factors and subjective well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, article number 1332124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1332124.
  16. Jamil, M.Y. (2024). Mann-Whitney U test: A guide to non-parametric analysis. Retrieved from  https:// medicalbiochem.com/mann-whitney-u-test/.
  17. Jiang, L., Chua, V., Wong, D.X.W., & Im, D.K. (2024). Gender inequality and subjective well-being amongst professional women in East and Southeast Asia: A study of eight societies. Asian Population Studies, 21(2), 137-157. doi: 10.1080/17441730.2024.2348929.
  18. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A.B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3-24. doi: 10.1257/089533006776526030.
  19. Kieny, C., Flores, G., Ingenhaag, M., & Maurer, J. (2022). Healthy, wealthy, wise, and happy? Assessing age differences in evaluative and emotional well-being among mature adults from five low- and middle-income countries. Social Indicators Research, 160(2), 1019-1050. doi: 10.1007/s11205-022-02927-3.
  20. Kovtun, O. (2023). Psychoemotional state of women during pregnancy. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 11(2), 139-143. doi: 10.31548/hspedagog14(2).2023.139-143.
  21. Moreno-Agostino, D., Chanfreau, J., Knowles, G., Pelikh, A., Das-Munshi, J., & Ploubidis, G.B. (2024). Gender inequalities in the disruption of long-term life satisfaction trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic and the role of time use: Evidence from a prospective cohort study. British Journal of Psychiatry Open, 10(6), article number e217. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.817.
  22. Oliveira, M.R., Sudati, I.P., Konzen, V.M., de Campos, A.C., Wibelinger, L.M., Correa, C., Miguel, F.M., Silva, R.N., & Borghi-Silva, A. (2022). COVID-19 and the impact on the physical activity level of elderly people: A systematic review. Experimental Gerontology, 159, article number 111675. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111675.
  23. Perrudet-Badoux, A., Mendelsohn, G., & Chiche, J. (1988). Development and validation of a scale for the subjective assessment of well-being. Journal of Anthropology and Human Biometry, 6(3-4), 121-134.
  24. Peyer, K.L., Hathaway, E.D., & Doyle, K. (2024). Gender differences in stress, resilience, and physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of American College Health, 72(2), 598-605. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2052075.
  25. Pieh, C., Budimir, S., & Probst, T. (2020). The effect of age, gender, income, work, and physical activity on mental health during coronavirus disease (COVID-19) lockdown in Austria. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 136, article number 110186. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110186.
  26. Pomytkin, E.O., & Pomytkina, L.V. (2024). Improvement of the subjective well-being of student youth in the conditions of military operations. Scientific Notes. Series: Psychology, 1, 116-123. doi: 10.32782/cusupsy-2024-1-16.
  27. Ruth, M.S.L., & Napier, J. (2023). Gender inequality and subjective well-being. In F. Maggino (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 2689-2695). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-172991_4144.
  28. Savelyuk, Н. (2022). Psychological well-being of student youth: A comparative analysis in covid and war contexts. Psychological Perspectives, 39, 322-340. doi: 10.29038/2227-1376-2022-39-sav.
  29. Segerstrom, S.C., Crosby, P., Witzel, D.D., Kurth, M.L., Choun, S., & Aldwin, C.M. (2023). Adaptation to changes in COVID-19 pandemic severity: Across older adulthood and time scales. Psychology and Aging, 38(6), 586-599. doi: 10.1037/pag0000739.
  30. Taylor, S.E., Klein, L., Lewis, B.P., Grunewald, T.L., Gurung, R.A., & Updegraff, J. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in women: Tending to befriend rather than fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107(3), 411-429. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.411.
  31. Tov, W. (2018). Well-being concepts and components. In E. Diener, S. Oishi & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of subjective well-being (pp. 1-15). Salt Lake City: Noba Scholar.
  32. Webb, L.M., & Chen, C.Y. (2022). The COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on older adults’ mental health: Contributing factors, coping strategies, and opportunities for improvement. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 37(1), article number e5647. doi: 10.1002/gps.5647.

https://doi.org/10.33989/2226-4078.2025.1.32