Article

Received 12.07.2024

Revised 17.10.2024

Accepted 25.11.2024

Retrieved from Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024

Pages 22 -29

Kuksa, Yu. (2024). Peculiarities of dialogic interaction of technical profile students with different types of communicative response. Psychology and Personality, 14(2), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.33989/2226-4078.2024.2.22

Peculiarities of dialogic interaction of technical profile students with different types of communicative response

Yurii Kuksa

Dialogic interaction is crucial in human communication, but there is a lack of research on the development of these skills of technical profile students, especially taking into account their personal characteristics. In this regard, the purpose of the research was to study the peculiarities of dialogic interaction of technical profile students with different types of communicative response. The empirical study covered 300 students of technical higher education institutions. The empirical research programme included the “Dialogicity of Interpersonal Relationships” methodics and “Test of Communication Skills”. It was found that technical profile students had an average level in terms of the self-worth of relationships, the constructiveness of relationships, and the dialogicity of relationships. At the same time, it was determined that almost a third of respondents tend to demonstrate an unpreparedness to interact with other people effectively, and the smallest proportion of respondents demonstrates a high ability to adapt in interaction situations, self-confidence in communication and the ability to construct open relationships. Furthermore, the biggest part of the respondents is inclined to a competent response in communication, but a third part of them tends to act aggressively in interaction, and the rest are inclined to addiction in communication. The study demonstrates that all indicators of dialogicity of relationships strongly correlate with the competent type of communicative response, while no significant correlation was found with other types. Therefore, the study made it possible to state that the construction of dialogic interaction among technical profile students correlates positively with the tendency to partnership in communication

interaction; dialogic interaction; self-worth of relationships; constructiveness of relationships; dialogicity of relationships; response in communication; technical profile students
  1. Alexander, R. (2020). A dialogic teaching companion (1st ed.). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781351040143.
  2. Alt, D., & Raichel, N. (2020). Higher education students’ perceptions of and attitudes towards peer assessment in multicultural classrooms. Asian-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(4), 567-580. doi: 10.1007/s40299-02000507-z.
  3. Altuna, O.K., & Arslan, F. (2016). Impact of the number of scale points on data characteristics and respondents’ evaluations: An experimental design approach using 5-point and 7-point Likert-type scales. Istanbul University Journal of Political Science, 55(55), 1-20. doi: 10.17124/iusiyasal.320009.
  4. American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/ethics/code.
  5. Bosniuk, V. (2020). Mathematical methods in psychology: Lecture course. Multimedia educational edition. Kharkiv: NUCPU.
  6. Dukhnovskyi, S. (2005). Dialogicity of interpersonal relations. Retrieved from https://psytests.org/family/ dialduh.html.
  7. Higher and professional higher education in 2023. (2023). Retrieved from https://ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/ operativ2021/m_w/vofp_23.xls.
  8. Hill, J., & West, H. (2019). Improving the student learning experience through dialogic feed-forward assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 82-97. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1608908.
  9. Holota, N., & Karnaukhova, A. (2022). Dialogical interaction as an integral component professional and personal growth of the future educator. In Conference proceedings of the international scientific conference “The role of psychology and pedagogy in the spiritual development of modern society” (pp. 220-224). Riga: Baltija Publishing. doi: 10.30525/978-9934-26-228-9-60.
  10. Kramarenko, T. (2021). Peculiarities of the professional dialogue mediated by modern means of telecommunication in the process of training future specialists in economics. Bulletin of Alfred Nobel University, 2(22), 212-219. doi: 10.32342/2522-4115-2021-2-22-24.
  11. Kuznetsova, H., Panasenko, A., Luchkina, L., Zenchenko, T., & Danylchenko, I. (2023). Dialogic learning as means of forming the communication skills of higher education students. Eduweb, 17(2), 101-115. doi: 10.46502/ issn.1856-7576/2023.17.02.9.
  12. Liubashenko, O., & Kornieva, Z. (2019). Dialogic interactive speaking skills assessment in the experiential teaching of technical English to tertiary school students. Advanced Education, 6(13), 18-25. doi: 10.20535/24108286.156228.
  13. Ljunggren, I., Najström, M., Levitt, D.H., & Ramnerö, J. (2022). Dialogue as psychological method – a study of training interviewing and communication skills in psychology students. Nordic Psychology, 75(4), 386-396. doi: 10.1080/19012276.2022.2112744.
  14. Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2019a). Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 187-199. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007.
  15. Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Major, L. (Eds.). (2019b). The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education (1st ed.). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429441677.
  16. Meshko, H., Habrusieva, N., & Kryskov, A. (2021). Research of professional responsibility of students of technical specialities by means of information and communication technologies. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1840(1), article number 012058. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012058.
  17. Michelson’s communicative skills test. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://um.co.ua/6/6-9/6-97710.html.
  18. National Psychological Association of Ukraine. (2021). Code of ethics for psychologists. Retrieved from https:// npa-ua.org/en/ethics/.
  19. Ng, W.S., & Yu, G. (2023). The impacts of dialogic interaction to engage students in peer assessment. The AsiaPacific Education Researcher, 32, 53-64. doi: 10.1007/s40299-021-00633-2.
  20. Pickering, M., & Garrod, S. (2021). Understanding dialogue: Language use and social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108610728.
  21. Sanders, K.B., & Gutiérrez-García, E. (2020). Understanding the role of dialogue in public sector communication. In V. Luoma-aho & M.J. Canel (Eds.), The handbook of public sector communication (pp. 289-302). Hoboken: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9781119263203.ch19.
  22. Šeďová, K., Šalamounová, Z., Švaříček, R., & Sedláček, M. (2020). Elements of dialogic teaching and how to get them into classrooms. In Getting dialogic teaching into classrooms. Understanding teaching-learning practice (pp. 17-36). Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-9243-0_2.
  23. Semerikov, S., Striuk, A., Striuk, L., Striuk, M., & Shalatska H. (2020). Sustainability in software engineering education: A case of general professional competencies. E3S Web of Conferences, 166(2), article number 10036. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202016610036.
  24. Slobodianiuk, O. (2019). Dialogization of the educational environment: Origins and prospects. Humanitarium, 43(1), 142-150. doi: 10.31470/2308-5126-2019-43-1-142-150.
  25. Sushchenko, L., Hrybanova, O., & Khodakovska, А. (2020). Educational dialogue as a factor of efficient humanistically-oriented teacher-student interaction. Pedagogy of the Formation of a Creative Person in Higher and Secondary Schools, 73(2), 214-217. doi: 10.32840/1992-5786.2020.73-2.40.
  26. Vukadinova, T., Terzieva, S., & Popov, M. (2021). Developing professional and communication skills of students in engineering disciplines. Foreign Language Teaching, 48, 255-266. doi: 10.53656/for21.33razv.

https://doi.org/10.33989/2226-4078.2024.2.22