Received 13.09.2023
Revised 28.12.2023
Accepted 28.02.2024
Retrieved from Vol. 14, No. 1, 2024
Pages 195 -208
Abstract
The aim of the interpretative phenomenological analysis is revealed, in particular, the investigation of one’s personal life experience from the perspective of the narrator as well as the impact of its parts ‒ phenomenology, hermeneutics, and ideography ‒ on its procedure and contents. Experience as one’s internal world, the unity of its aspects (desires, feelings, motivation, assumptions, etc.) that are meaningful for them based on which they construct their actions are defined as an object of the research in IPA. Experience is considered as a phenomenal, but not objective reality; the importance of investigating one’s experience within their specific social and cultural context is stressed. The narrator acts as an experiential expert. The subjectivity bias of the researcher is inevitable; the author offers to focus on the way the latter shapes research as well as consider it when processing empirical data both as the system of values of the respondent and the researcher. IPA foresees “disciplined spontaneity” of the researcher that includes following both the structure and the demand of a free scientific inquiry. The synthesis of meaning-making of research participants and the researcher is postulated. IPA poses a question of relationship between the processes of cognition, the contents of narratives, and one’s behavior. Contemplating on a meaningful event is understood as a part of the being-in-the-world but not as a mere cognitive activity. IPA methodologists see people as those who existentially reveal the world. When speaking on life events that make sense to a person, they simultaneously realize a big number of tasks but not only picks up words-carriers of meaning available in the culture. The stress is done also on the aspects of life world experiencing: temporality, spaciality, embodiment, self, sociality, discourse, and project. Interviews is named the basic method for getting empirical evidence (repeated interviews are allowed), but multi-mоdal forms of data collection are also acceptable. The researcher carries out profound, thorough analysis of a case (n=1...30), on the basis of which constructs a way to universal laws and structures. As a result, the research conducted on the grounds of IPA, often investigate existential issues and contain descriptions of transformational experience bringing change, touching upon one’s identity and feelings of the self
Keywords:
phenomenological reality, experience, hermeneutics, agency, existential involvement[1] Ashworth, P.D. (2008). Conceptual foundations in qualitative psychology. In J.A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 4-25). London: Sage.
[2] Bayer, O. (2019). Qualitative methods for studying the relationship between traits and personality substructures. In The role of dispositional and dynamic personality traits in determining quality of life (pp. 76-103). Dnipro: Lira.
[3] Bayer, O. (2020). Justified theory as a method of working with text. In Proceedings of the All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference “Narrative Psychology: Theory, Empiricism, and Practice” (pp. 4-7). Kryvyi Rih: R. A. Kozlov Publishing.
[4] Bayer, O. (2022). Thematic analysis as a method of working with text. In Qualitative research in psychology: Problems and solutions (pp. 4-9). Dnipro: Alfred Nobel University.
[5] Dahlberg, K. (2006). The essence of essences: The search for meaning structures in phenomenological analysis of lifeworld phenomena. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 1(1), 11-19. doi: 10.1080/17482620500478405.
[6] Evans, M. (1993). Reading lives: How the personal might be social. Sociology: The Journal of the British Sociological Association, 27(1), 5-13. doi: 10.1177/003803859302700102.
[7] Halling, S. (2008). Intimacy, transcendence, and psychology: Closeness and openness in everyday life. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230610255.
[8] Husserl, E. (2020). Ideas for a pure phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy. Vol. 1: General introduction to pure phenomenology. Kharkiv: Folio.
[9] Kvale, S. (2003). The qualitative research interview. Moscow: Smysl.
[10] Richardson, F. C. (1999). Re-envisioning psychology: Moral dimensions of theory and practice (2nd ed.). San-Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
[11] Ricœur, P. (2002). Intellectual autobiography: Love and justice. Kyiv: Dukha i Litera.
[12] Smith, J., & Eatough, V. (2007). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In Analysing qualitative data in psychology (pp. 35-50). London: SAGE Publications, Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9781446207536.
[13] Smith, J.A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2021). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
[14] Spinelli, E. (1989). The interpreted world: An introduction to phenomenological psychology. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
[15] Willig, C. (2012). Qualitative interpretation and analysis in psychology. Berkshire: Open University Press.
[16] Yanchar, S. C. (2015). Truth and disclosure in qualitative research: Implications of hermeneutic realism. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(2), 107-124. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2014.933460.